What's the difference between open and focused meditation?
Answer
Open and focused meditation represent two fundamentally different approaches to mental training, each with distinct cognitive, neural, and physiological effects. Focused attention meditation (FAM) requires sustained concentration on a single object—such as the breath, a mantra, or a visual point—while actively filtering out distractions. This practice enhances convergent thinking, activates specific brain regions like the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC), and promotes physiological relaxation by decreasing heart rate and increasing parasympathetic activity [1][8][10]. In contrast, open monitoring meditation (OMM) cultivates a non-reactive awareness of all arising thoughts, sensations, and emotions without fixation on any single stimulus. OMM is associated with divergent thinking, reduced activity in the visual cortex, and lower cortisol levels, suggesting it enhances stress resilience and emotional regulation [1][5][10].
Key distinctions include:
- Attentional Scope: FAM narrows focus to a single point, while OMM expands awareness to observe all mental phenomena without attachment [2][4]
- Cognitive Effects: FAM improves problem-solving and self-regulation, whereas OMM fosters creativity and emotional detachment [1][8]
- Neural Mechanisms: FAM engages high-frequency gamma waves and the ACC, while OMM is linked to theta waves and reduced visual cortex activity [6][5]
- Physiological Impact: FAM lowers heart rate and boosts relaxation, while OMM reduces cortisol and may increase sympathetic arousal [10]
These differences make each technique suited to specific goals—FAM for sharpening concentration and OMM for stress reduction and insight.
Core Differences Between Open and Focused Meditation
Attentional Mechanisms and Cognitive Outcomes
Focused attention meditation (FAM) and open monitoring meditation (OMM) train the mind in opposing ways, with measurable effects on attention, creativity, and cognitive control. FAM operates by directing sustained focus toward a chosen anchor—commonly the breath, a bodily sensation, or a repeated phrase—while suppressing irrelevant stimuli. Research demonstrates this practice strengthens the brain’s ability to filter distractions, as evidenced by increased activation in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC), a region critical for conflict monitoring and self-regulation [8]. Studies further show FAM enhances convergent thinking, the cognitive process of narrowing possibilities to arrive at a single solution, making it particularly effective for tasks requiring precision and logical analysis [1]. For example:
- Participants practicing FAM exhibited improved performance on the Stroop task, a measure of attentional control, compared to non-meditators [1]
- FAM practitioners demonstrated higher heart rate variability (HRV), a biomarker of parasympathetic dominance and stress resilience [8]
- Zen meditation, a form of FAM, is associated with gamma wave activity, linked to heightened focus and cognitive binding [6]
In contrast, OMM abandons the narrow lens of FAM, instead training practitioners to observe the entirety of their experience—thoughts, emotions, and sensations—as they arise, without judgment or attachment. This "objectless" approach [5] fosters divergent thinking, the ability to generate multiple creative solutions to a problem. Neuroscientific evidence reveals OMM reduces activity in the visual cortex and retrosplenial cortex, areas typically engaged in processing external stimuli, suggesting a shift toward internalized awareness [5]. Key findings include:
- OMM practitioners scored higher on tests of creative ideation, such as the Alternate Uses Task, compared to FAM practitioners [1]
- The practice is linked to theta wave dominance, which correlates with deep relaxation and insight [6]
- Vipassana, a classic OMM technique, has been shown to reduce cortisol levels by 20% in chronic stress patients [10]
The cognitive trade-offs are clear: FAM excels at honing laser-like concentration, while OMM broadens perceptual flexibility. As noted in [4], "FAM is like using a microscope to examine a single cell, whereas OMM is like stepping back to view the entire ecosystem."
Physiological and Neural Underpinnings
The divergent effects of FAM and OMM extend beyond cognition into measurable physiological and neural changes, reflecting their distinct mechanisms of action. A 2021 study published in Frontiers in Psychology directly compared the autonomic impacts of both practices in 41 healthy adults. Focused attention meditation was found to:
- Decrease heart rate by an average of 5 beats per minute during practice, indicating enhanced parasympathetic (rest-and-digest) activity [10]
- Increase high-frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV), a marker of cardiac health and emotional regulation [10]
- Activate the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a region associated with executive control and working memory [8]
These changes align with FAM’s role in stress reduction through active distraction suppression. Conversely, open monitoring meditation produced a contrasting physiological profile:
- Increased sympathetic nervous system activity, suggesting a state of alert relaxation rather than sedation [10]
- Reduced cortisol levels by up to 25% in regular practitioners, indicating lower stress hormone output [10]
- Decreased activity in the default mode network (DMN), the brain system active during mind-wandering, which may explain its effects on rumination reduction [5]
Neuroimaging studies further reveal that OMM uniquely downregulates the retrosplenial cortex, a hub for spatial and episodic memory, which may contribute to its "detached observer" quality [5]. Meanwhile, FAM’s gamma wave signature—observed at frequencies above 30 Hz—correlates with heightened perceptual binding and attentional precision [6]. As summarized in [1], "The neural signatures of FAM and OMM are as distinct as their phenomenological experiences," with FAM resembling a "spotlight" of attention and OMM a "floodlight" of awareness.
The choice between techniques may thus depend on individual needs: FAM for those seeking to calm an overactive mind or improve focus, and OMM for those aiming to cultivate equanimity or creative insight. Clinical applications are already emerging, with FAM being integrated into treatments for ADHD and OMM into programs for anxiety and depression [10].
Sources & References
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
contemplative-studies.org
psychologytoday.com
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Discussions
Sign in to join the discussion and share your thoughts
Sign InFAQ-specific discussions coming soon...